Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Technology is the most powerful weapon which can be used to change the world tremendously. Nevertheless, one of the most controversial issue today leads to that, the gap between poor and rich people is rising due to modern technology. In this essay, I am going to explore all the dimensions of the given topic through some examples and assertions and shape up my viewpoint by the end, in the further piece of essay.
The first step to understand that, why some people believe that modern technology is not increasing the gap among poor and rich? Broadly speaking, the prominent reason is advancement. Similarly, due to modernization in technology every nation is being developed and its helping the economy as well. Nowadays, news machines are introduced and making production of distinct things more instant which is highly beneficial for the economy growth. Moreover, education has become more efficient and effective with the help of modern equipments such as educomp smart classes, e- books and many more. Through this system students can acquire every type of knowledge which will be useful for them. Hence, these technologies can be useful for both poor and rich.
However, there is another group of people who argue that, modern technology is enhancing the gap between poor and rich. Why do they think so? The forest reason is that, poor people can not afford to approach these facilities which modern technology provides. Likewise, due to new machines which do each and every work by their self is becoming threat for poor people as they can not find jobs anymore in the industries. Thus, due to lack of money they can not send there children to advanced schools, as a result there child cannot get enough knowledge which other rich children are gathering. In addition, it becomes difficult for them to provide there child proper education so children start working at the age of their learning. For instance, it has been seen that in countries such as india and Pakistan child labour is a major issue due to poverty.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that, modern technology is increasing the gap between the poor and rich and government should take some initiative to provide same level of knowledge to poor and rich people because if only rich people will have approach than poor will become more poor and rich will become more rich.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-10 | Rasadini De SIlva | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | oxfordpro111 | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | Nirav pandit | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | buihaianhmrbi | 96 | view |
| 2018-11-12 | drtruong92 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compariso 67
- Some business observe that new employees who just graduated from a college or university seem to like interpersonal skills needed for communication with their colleagues What could be reason for this What solution can help address this problem 54
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment books is waste of time. In their opinion, children should read only serious, educational books. Do you agree or disagree? Give reason for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience. 38
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, likewise, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, thus, well, broadly speaking, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5648561147 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517676767677 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8256971362 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246780239807 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080275882632 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966954263091 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169213263404 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584133330666 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.