Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The most powerful weapon, which we all know, is the nuclear weapon. And along with it, are the consequences that we have witnessed in human history. However, some people believe that it brings advantages to the world. I disagree with this viewpoint, and I will explain why in the following paragraphs.
First, because of the devastating destructive power of nuclear weapons on humans and the environment, moral and ethnic values should be considered when deciding whether or not to use them. For example, the two cities in Japan experienced a direct detonation that caused a mass loss of civilian life from nuclear weapons that would go far beyond any other weapon invented. This resulted in the deaths of over 200,000 civilians and military personnel on both sides of the conflict. Moreover, in the quest to develop this technology, researchers have generated about 2000 test explosions since 1980, which has increased the exposure of the world’s population to radiation and the unrestrained release into the environment of the radioactive materials that have been dispersed and deposited everywhere on the planet, which may lead to the contamination of air, soil, water, and the food supply. Second, when the detonations of nuclear weapons occur, they will release radiation, which is a scientifically proven carcinogen in humans, such as lung and breast cancers.
Admittedly, there are some advantages to nuclear weapons, such as defending a country’s border, generating electricity from nuclear reactors, or helping to diagnose and treat several diseases. However, compared to the disadvantages that humans and the environment have suffered, the consequences seem worse than the benefits that have been achieved so far.
In conclusion, using destructive weapons is not the right way to make the world a peaceful place to live because it has negative effects on people and the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australians that exported to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 78
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays more and more people from different cities are spending more time away from their families What are the possible reasons and the effects on the people themselves and their fami lies 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lues should be considered when deciding whether or not to use them. For example, the two citie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94988512017 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.4791258922 49.4020404114 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182986417782 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678584077564 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527980130681 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110598603148 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405487734396 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.