For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that teachers play a more important role in children's intellectual and social development than parents; however, others disagree. I disagree with the notion that parents have less influence on their children's intellectual and social development than teachers.
In the first place, parents brought their children into the world and spend a lot of time with them; as a result, parents know exactly what level of intelligence their children have. Understanding a child's preferences allows parents to devote more time and resources toward helping the child become more educated in that specific area. As a result of this knowledge, parents are able to place their child in an environment where he or she will be able to develop social communication skills. For example, everyone knows that scientist Thomas Edison was expelled from school as a child because his teachers underestimated him, but thanks to his mother's proper upbringing with Edison, he became a genius of the century. The meals are a further reason. In order to feed their children a healthy and well-balanced diet, parents plan the menus for their meals. For example, children today are smarter and healthier because their parents' nutritional knowledge has improved over the years.
The positive impact of teachers on students' intellectual and social skills, on the other hand, cannot be argued with. To make children smarter, teachers receive specialized training in how to instruct them and can assist them in honing their communicative capabilities. If students participate in group exercises assigned by teachers, these skills are reinforced for them. As a result of their continuing role as teachers and knowledge transmitters, parents are critical in helping their children develop important interpersonal and communication skills throughout life.
To summarize, parents have a greater impact on their children's ability to become intelligent and competent than teachers do. However, both parties must work together for the benefit of children's holistic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- You are advised to spend about 20 minutes on this task The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the info
- The pie chart shows the sources of electricity in the four countries from 2003 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, for example, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55379746835 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93223654162 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1581910867 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512129652305 0.244688304435 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17051076519 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126931438075 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322273930866 0.151304729494 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540326291913 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.