In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that lots of humans trust that they buy things on their necessity. Some people concur that advertisement is not necessary. However, I quibble from them and propound that I do believe that advertisement is not needed.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of if a person wants to buy something which is essential for him is going to purchase it. The top notch concrete reason is now-days, there are plenty's of advertiser who do negative advertising for a product and this will impact directly on the consumers. Another rationale which hauls me to patron is people buy for their everyday purposes products like sugar, salt and spices. To uphold my notion, I would quote on instance of that for instance regular basis kitchen things without being featured in any tv commercial or campaigns. Which is prime facie testimony. Thus, it is clear that advertisement is not necessary to buy daily household things.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So the public in general tent to distinguish that advertising play immense role in market to target customers. Companies usually try to create ads according to that customers profile which helps them to attract buyer the most. To illustrate if the car brand renault's new car aims to be sold to big families, the brand making a short tv commercial where a family of 4 using their product happily.
In recapitulation, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting to advertisement is not mandatory to buy daily products. However, its contrary can be overlooked or controlled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...al for him is going to purchase it. The top notch concrete reason is now-days, there are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ls me to patron is people buy for their everyday purposes products like sugar, salt and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ured in any tv commercial or campaigns. Which is prime facie testimony. Thus, it is c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, thus, for instance, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06273062731 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9163666858 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627306273063 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.253941302 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183274737869 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574025299573 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572994465838 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102388748773 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554394835314 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.