Some believe that students learn better in schools when they study in groups. Others say that students will learn better when they study own.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the industrial age, education is one of many prominent aspects of a global society. There are many arguments about student’s teamwork, which is better for learning at schools, but other arguments indicate that self-study show many positives in academic performance. This essay will discuss both sides of these arguments and I will give my perspective.
There are many merits of teamwork at schools. The first benefit is the expansion of knowledge while cooperating. The reason is that because the students are likely to approach and gain many viewpoints from other members, which helps them have many perspectives from one problem, and finds out an ideal solution. Besides, the enhancement of student’s personality is also a remarkable benefit. If students study in groups, they can develop some essential skills such as collaboration, representation and feel confident when talking in public.
On the other hand, self-study also brings about many positive aspects for students. First of all, this method helps learners more concentrate on their lessons because they are kept from some distractions such as talking among others. Therefore, their specialized knowledge (specialized insights) is more profound and in-depth due to the fact that lots of time are spent on research. Another advantage is the intrinsic management. In this age, the controlling skills of time and works are highly required. If they follow this method, they will approach and practice the requirements sooner due to the arrangement of timeline and to-do lists for school attendance
In conclusion, I believe both sides have their merits about making progress in student’s knowledge and personality. On balance, however, it seems that self-study is better for academic performance because it plays a massive role in educating people who match the standard of the modern age.
- Some believe that students learn better in schools when they study in groups. Others say that student will learn better when they study own.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017. 73
- The graph below gives information from a report in 2010 about the use of energy in Australia since 1980 with projections until 2030 56
- These days, people have little knowledge about the natural world. What can be the causes? And How can tackle this problem? 73
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 661, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne and to-do lists for school attendance In conclusion, I believe both sides have...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4724137931 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99578776818 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572413793103 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5928788645 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266021748869 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694564809842 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756306970349 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149399826451 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315112032092 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.