Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that children can broaden their knowledge by watching tv. While I agree with the of watching TV could bring plenty of benefits for children, I do believe that they shouldn’t watch TV often inside and outside school.
On the one hand, there are variety of reasons why watching TV is beneficial in some ways. One reason is that children can draw inspiration and easily access a world of knowledge through some interesting television programs. For example, some educational TV shows namely “road to Olympia” or “who is the millionaire” can bring enormous information about different aspect of life, from science to culture. Furthermore, youngsters can not only enlarge their knowledge but also develop their soft skills through watching TV. They may learn how to organize a meeting or to gain confidence in a crowd.
One the other hand, watching tv frequently could have some drawbacks to children mentally and physically. Firstly, children who watching tv all the time could be gradually addicted to TV and this can carry health risks to them. There is a study which show that children who are addicted to watching TV, instead of playing outdoor games, are more prone to obesity and watching TV for too long can be detrimental to health and result in vision problem. Secondly, with the expansion of media, some television programs are not right for the children but they can see it on TV easily. As a result, children could learn bad behavior and this can negatively affect the children in later life.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I accept that watching TV is beneficial for children to expand the world of knowledge but I believe everything is good in moderation.
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching TV. Therefore, children should watch TV regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree ? 73
- In some countries the government has tried to reduce traffic For instance they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour Do you think the development is positive or negative 85
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04195804196 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85059189045 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534965034965 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6053303227 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.923076923 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434446969585 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183737641282 0.084324248473 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845283812788 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287730645598 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109380531844 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.