Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that children can broaden their knowledge by watching tv. While I agree with the of watching TV could bring plenty of benefits for children, I do believe that they shouldn’t watch TV often inside and outside school.
On the one hand, there are variety of reasons why watching TV is beneficial in some ways. One reason is that children can draw inspiration and easily access a world of knowledge through some interesting television programs. For example, some educational TV shows namely “road to Olympia” or “who is the millionaire” can bring enormous information about different aspect of life, from science to culture. Furthermore, youngsters can not only enlarge their knowledge but also develop their soft skills through watching TV. They may learn how to organize a meeting or to gain confidence in a crowd.
One the other hand, watching tv frequently could have some drawbacks to children mentally and physically. Firstly, children who watching tv all the time could be gradually addicted to TV and this can carry health risks to them. There is a study which show that children who are addicted to watching TV, instead of playing outdoor games, are more prone to obesity and watching TV for too long can be detrimental to health and result in vision problem. Secondly, with the explosion of media, some television programs are not right for the children but they can see it on TV easily. As a result, children could learn bad behavior and this can negatively affect the children in later life. For instance, while watching a reality show namely “top model” - the show could tells children that they should have bodies like supermodels, and this sometimes leads to eating disorders such as anorexia or bulimia.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I accept that watching TV is beneficial for children to expand the world of knowledge but I believe everything is good in moderation.
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching TV. Therefore, children should watch TV regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree ? 73
- In some countries the government has tried to reduce traffic For instance they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour Do you think the development is positive or negative 85
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 777, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'tell'
Suggestion: tell
... 'top model' - the show could tells children that they should have bodies l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.103125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84336824319 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.173169511 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422151203912 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177248890103 0.084324248473 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847469015278 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282147964324 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104749148933 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.