Nowadays, overusing of smartphones by children becomes a huge problem. This is because of various reasons, and I believe it is a negative trend which in the following I will go into details and elaborate it.
There are several factors which may be responsible for excessive use of smartphones by young people. With the development of technology and easy access, everyone has smartphones and they provide an immense amount of entertaining content such as games, videos and social media which are really interesting and also addictive. Therefore children tend to spend more and more time on it. Another reason can be the competitiveness between children to have the latest smartphones and being the best in the games they are playing, they do not want to lag behind their friends and try to play more to reach higher scores and levels in the games. Furthermore, parents play a crucial role in this case. Most parents are too lenient and permissive about using mobiles by their children. They make their children accustomed to do whatever they want and do not have enough control and power over their children anymore to compel them not to use their mobiles to excess.
In my conviction, this development is completely negative. Firstly, It is a huge waste of time which can be consumed for studying or learning other profitable activities with observable outcomes. Secondly, spending much time on mobiles can be a source of distraction and act as an impediment for children to have long lasting concentration. For example, during school lessons or studying their mind might frequently jump into the middle of the game which they have been playing recently. So, they cannot focus on their lessons. Finally, this long gazing at the screens of the mobiles can be harmful and detrimental to children's eyes and might make them have poor eye sight.
In conclusion, excess consumption of smartphones by children is becoming common in recent times for a range of reason and it can have negative irreparable consequences. However, it can be addressed by taking some possible measures.
- Some people believe that social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way 84
- These days too many people maintain their health by relying on doctors and medicine rather than by following a healthy lifestyle To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 67
- Nowadays many children have trouble paying attention in class or concentrating on their school work Why is this happening How can this problem be solved 73
- Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... really interesting and also addictive. Therefore children tend to spend more and more ti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...rens eyes and might make them have poor eye sight. In conclusion, excess consumption o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05523255814 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81857293088 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8239845244 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.294117647 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228709293584 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777112855027 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441976800916 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137869254324 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415187276899 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.