It is a contemporary phenomenon that kids spend a substantial part of their daily lives with smartphones. This essay will figure out the motivations and give assessments on the aforementioned issue based on personal points of view.
First and foremost, smartphones are the fruits of the fourth technology revolution, rooted in the last decades of the twentieth century. Since the first smartphone was introduced in the 2010s, people have adopted new habits, including using that innovation in almost all daily activities. Due to the hustle and bustle in most modern residential areas, parents have less time to spend playing and educating their children. Therefore, they tend to rely on digital devices for babysitting. In addition, urban lives in mega cities are much more complex than those in the countryside. In such environments, letting children play in public playgrounds or other crowded areas without parents’ supervision is an absolute risk. Indeed, parents have no choice but to lock children inside an apartment with the accompaniment of smartphones for education and entertainment.
On the one hand, this issue indicates a number of beneficial tendencies. The popularity of smartphones reflects a society in which development is constantly happening at an unprecedented speed. In a digital age, smartphones help kids open access to a broader flat world in which they are nurtured to be global citizens. Mastering smart devices also provides children with digital skills that suit the ongoing development tendency. On the other hand, gluing onto electrical screens and immersing themselves in a virtual world might expose young people to shortsightedness, while seductive lifestyles might end up with worrying health issues. Furthermore, researchers found that children with shortages of direct connections often have difficulties in building and sustaining relationships in the future.
To sum up, the use of smartphones at an early period during people’s lifetime is neither good nor bad. Owing to the fact that technologies are merely inanimate tools, it is our purposes of using and approaches to those devices that decide the ultimate out turns.
- Some people think that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however think that life of elderly in the modern world is much better than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 90
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49552238806 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12963970562 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632835820896 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9112417693 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.294117647 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13938075535 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408490457928 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304469091231 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763264885121 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032891516917 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49552238806 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12963970562 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632835820896 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9112417693 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.294117647 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13938075535 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408490457928 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304469091231 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763264885121 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032891516917 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.