In some cities and towns all over the world, traffic jams are a problem.
What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
What concerns many people these days is the dramatic traffic congestion in metropolis around the world. This essay will examine the prime causes associated and propose solutions to address this issue.
There are two main reasons resulting in traffic hold-ups in cities. First, the more people choose to live in metropolitan areas, the higher traffic participants are, leading to congestion during peak hours. This is especially true in some developing countries where the public transportation system is undeveloped and the majority of city dwellers use private cars or motorbikes as their main means of transportation. In addition, the second most prominent cause is the poor quality of infrastructure. Take Vietnam, for instance, roads are degraded with potholes due to the lack of maintenance, and the deficiency in transport facilities such as traffic lights or road warning signs will also bring about road accidents and consequently gridlocks.
Fortunately, solutions still exist to ameliorate this situation. This includes a concerted effort made by governments and communities. The governments should consider implementing other traffic calming methods such as constructing more overpasses and underpasses so as to minimize the certain number of cars and other vehicles on congested roads. Besides, the investment in the development of infrastructure with long-term maintenance, including widening the roads and easing the bottlenecks, will help relieve congestion. Furthermore, once the citizens are encouraged to switch to public transport and by using these means of transportation, the traffic in the city will flow more freely. These practices would prove useful in reducing the volume of vehicles on the road and ease congestion.
All things considered, traffic delays have been a great source of concern that need to be dealt with urgently. Only when the government and authorities, in combination with individual efforts, can the situation improve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | linh allie | 56 | view |
- Discuss the pros and cons for children of watching television 73
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- anyone can use mobile phone to answer the work or make personal call at any time of 7 days a week Does this development have positive or negative effect on both individuals and society 56
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The internet has made knowledge immediately available to people through computers and smartphones all around the world Much of this knowledge is also free Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ructing more overpasses and underpasses so as to minimize the certain number of cars and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...switch to public transport and by using these means of transportation, the traffic in the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, second, so, still, well, as to, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67567567568 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13282621175 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631756756757 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2010676055 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178719297968 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560271739351 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445470836078 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114488602083 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577414734711 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.