In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
It is widely believed that the massive stream of traffic in many urban areas worldwide is now considered an acute problem. In my opinion, there are many remarkable reasons and significant solutions for this phenomenon.
To start with, the increase in private vehicles probably has an enormous effect on this phenomenon. Specifically, it comes from a core recognition that personal vehicles are much more convenient than other means of transport. Take the bus as an example, this kind of public transport may be more time-consuming or complicated than other private transport such as motorbikes, bikes, cars, and so on. This would lead to the fact that people are likely to prefer using personal models of transport instead. What is more, overpopulation in urban areas is possibly also one of the major reasons for this issue. In other words, the more increase in citizens, the higher number of traffic participants would be. Especially in rush hour, when the demand for moving is essential, the volume of traffic is extremely high.
A number of definite actions could be taken to mitigate the problem above, especially the responsibility of the government. For one thing, authorities may have to encourage the use of public transport widely. Specifically, they could subsidize sharply in this field by developing the quality and quantity of each vehicle. By doing this, more and more people might tend to use these means of transport because of their convenience instead of choosing the private ones. For other things, politics should enact some laws in terms of encouraging people to settle down in suburban areas. In detail, nations might have to boost the life quality in these regions by creating more jobs or developing the infrastructures, road conditions, environment, and so on. Consequently, the traffic burden in cities could be cut down.
In conclusion, the high traffic congestion generally comes from the increase in population and private vehicles. However, applying the proper political strategies would be the key method to manage this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | linh allie | 56 | view |
- Many people think that bottled water should be banned Do you agree or disagree 80
- The line graph shows the information for internet users as percentage of population in three countries from 1999 and 2009 78
- Some people choose to have their first child at an older age What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- With the advancement in technology the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased Some people believe that there will be no role for teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people choose to have their first child at an older age What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificant solutions for this phenomenon. To start with, the increase in private v...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
... more and more people might tend to use these means of transport because of their convenien...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, kind of, such as, for one thing, in my opinion, in other words, to start with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25377643505 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91324528844 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561933534743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8422460468 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6111111111 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216018106555 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065564528578 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425094988051 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124590170016 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015077260231 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificant solutions for this phenomenon. To start with, the increase in private v...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
... more and more people might tend to use these means of transport because of their convenien...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, kind of, such as, for one thing, in my opinion, in other words, to start with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25377643505 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91324528844 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561933534743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8422460468 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6111111111 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216018106555 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065564528578 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425094988051 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124590170016 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015077260231 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.