In some cities, public parks and open spaces are changed into gardens where local residents can grow their own fruit and vegetables. Do you think the benefits outweigh the disadvantages
Recreational areas play an important role to guarantee the well-being of citizens. In certain urban areas, the public spaces are converted into gardens for the local planting their edible vegetation. I believe that the merits from this trend would definately overshadow its drawbacks.
If local citizens are allowed to plant their trees and vegetables at the public places, they can attain various benefits in form of money, and widening their social circle. The first merit is that the output from plants in parks or open spaces would provide people with sources of either income or food. Another point in support of this view is that when local people plant, cultivate anf harvest their outcomes, they will have a sense of social solidarity, which is created when people work together in order to gain their results. Likewise, when people accumulate their products, they also have a sense of fulfillment. Finally, as the approach encourages people to work regularly and dilligently, it tend to attract more people to get involved in the activities compared to traditional recreational activities.
On the other hand, there are issues associated with plantation of fruits and vegetables in public areas. The first disadvantage is that the green areas once supply shades for the public, would be eliminated to make room for growing other plants. Additionally, it is obvious that cultivation of edible vegetation requires the usage of fertilizers and chemicals, which would realease smell and have detrimental impications on the local environment. More importantly, while some people may favor agricultural activities, others who advocate conventional pursuits such as running, walking or sightseeing, may object to the new way public spaces are utilized.
In sum, I side with the view that public areas should be deployed for growing useful plants. Even though there are pitfalls, the gains from the suggestion are tremendous
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-30 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 84
- Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important Discuss both views 78
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 703, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tends'?
Suggestion: tends
...e to work regularly and dilligently, it tend to attract more people to get involved ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, likewise, may, so, well, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38486842105 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79729654993 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3762134273 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.928571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202975362081 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649297615616 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608614115017 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108289225788 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352066114907 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.