In some cities, there is little control on the design and construction of homes and other buildings, and owners can decide on the styles of their houses.
Do the advantages of this outweigh its drawbacks
It is undeniable that how houses are built has an immense bearing on the urban landscape. Thereby, it is controversial whether households should be given the autonomy to construct their homes at their will. In some specific urbans, regulations on the way in which houses are designed and constructed are quite lax. While this trend reflects certain downsides, I believe they are eclipsed by the upsides.
On one side of the argument, being entitled to decide on house styles appears to be beneficial in various ways. Since house construction requires depleting astronomical budget or taking out a mortgage, owners would be content to possess a house decorated to their liking. If the house fails to meet the dwellers’ demands, householders might suffer from stress and unpleasure throughout their living experience; such has adverse effect on other realms such as work performance and well-being of the inhabitants. Alternatively, the city would look more vibrant and lively thanks to the diversity in shape and color of houses. Singapore has perfectly exemplified this principle; tourists are reported to be appealed by the variation of colors displayed on houses near the renowned Chinatown. All of these elements precisely manifest the good merits brought by the above-mentioned phenomenon.
On the other end of the debate, there are grounds supporting the view that the authorities should rigidly take the reins over how houses are styled and constructed. One of the major motives is safety. Not having architectural expertise at their fingertips, owners may err on the side of being unscrupulous and deprived of some fundamental safety criteria, which can detrimentally put the lives of either owners or even neighbors in jeopardy. Moreover, sometimes, self-designed houses are in bad taste thus spoiling the beauty of the neighborhood. This situation is attributed to the fact that not all the owners are well-versed in architecture; consequently, their houses might be grotesque and look completely out of place. On the upshot, the state control over designing and building accommodations is needed to a certain extent.
Overall, despite aforementioned benefits offered by the supervision of the state on house design and construction, I believe it would be better to grant people the freedom to design and build their own homes.
- In some cities there is little control on the design and construction of homes and other buildings and owners can decide on the styles of their houses Do the advantages of this outweigh its drawbacks 89
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas Other think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss and give opinion 84
- The chart below shows the most important causes of stress for different age groups in Canada 92
- Some people believe that children should spend all of their free time with their families Others believe that this is unnecessary or even negative Discuss the possible arguments on both sides and say which side you personally support 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to design and build their own homes.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35772357724 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09456379571 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593495934959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7937940062 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.294117647 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296900508514 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812431363591 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465440598589 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174138462642 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378208033525 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.