Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, some nations allow the elderly to work to any age that they want. While there are some undeniable benefits of this trend, I believe that its drawbacks should not be overlooked.
On the one hand, the participation of the elderly in the workforce brings several positive aspects. For one, the elderly are people who have gained a great amount of experience and knowledge throughout their careers. This means hiring such experienced people may increase labor productivity as seniors are used with their works. Moreover, when the young and the old work together, it enables junior to acquire working skills from their seniors. Finally, allowing people to work without the limitation of age helps them to make more money to prepare for their retirements, especially for those who have little to no pension.
By contrast, there are some noteworthy negative aspects of this trend. Firstly, letting the elderly to work longer than they should may result in an abundance of workers. Along with the increasing rate of birth, the young may find it hard to seek for an occupation because the workforce tends to hire the old who are more skillful. As a consequence, the unemployment rate would rise. Secondly, the majority of old people do not have the right health conditions to work. Thus, if they keep on doing their work, it may lead to health problems that may impact their expectancy. Therefore, the balance in the workforce will be affected.
To sum up the essay, I reaffirm that although enabling the old to work to any age brings various advantages, its disadvantages are of great concern.
(269 words)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- some people believe that young people should be responsible for maintaining national traditions 89
- the bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household tasks equallym To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- the chart shows something 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9815498155 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63902915569 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586715867159 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9919485235 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30064308306 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886183563344 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101910225454 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193642057687 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539459423208 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.