In some countries around the world, the government makes higher education free for everyone.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is widely acknowledged that higher tuition is free of charge for all citizens in some nations across the world. While there is no denying the negative effects of this phenomenon, I would contend its benefits are more significant.
On the one hand, this phenomenon could give rise to several negative effects. To begin with, the overall quality of education in colleges may decline. The preparation for exams and the learning experience, which may suffer significantly since there might not be enough books in the library or not enough quiet spaces to study on campus, is a case in point. As a result, students who do not have a great graduate degree may struggle with finding work, which gives rise to the unemployment rate. Additionally, the government budget has been allocated for a wide range of purposes, including health care and public transportation. If the administration is forced to endow with a large portion of school fees, it will inevitably result in major financial shortages in other public services. This could act as a precursor to deteriorating quality of live.
On the other hand, I would contend that the aforementioned drawbacks pales in comparison with the advantages of this phenomenon. Firstly, receiving financial support could give youngsters opportunities to attend college. The justification for this is that the free-college policy would be a real blessing since they would now be able to acquire a great education without having to pay large sums of money for it. As a result, young adults from impoverished families would be able to get out of poverty, since education and financial wealth are strongly correlated, which acts as a precursor to higher living standards. Secondly, the quality of the nation’s workforce would witness a significant improvement. This can be attributable to the fact that subsidizing university tuition permits a growing number of citizens to enroll, resulting in an employable labor force. Many Western countries such as Germany and Denmark, where offer tertiary education to their residents to maintain leading positions in the industrial sector.
In conclusion, it is a common occurrence that the ministry subsidies for higher tuition fees in some countries all over the world. Although there are no doubt some undesirable aspects of this growing trend, I would assert it is more crucial.
What band can I achieve?
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 73
- The table illustrates the all time top Olympics medals in several sports and the line graph depicts the number of rewards earned by five different countries in all Olympics 84
- The table illustrates the all time top Olympics medals in several sports and the line graph depicts the number of rewards earned by five different countries in all Olympics 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20779220779 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99751963579 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574025974026 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3795893267 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.526315789 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214109985038 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584689269284 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572123344577 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115083541824 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680116182659 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.