Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants.
Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
It is widely acknowledged that these days, a great amount of food bought from shops and restaurants is being thrown away irresponsibly. This tendency can be attributed to a host of reasons, and there are some workable solutions to cope with this.
To begin with, there are several reasons why food is being wasted. Firstly, the low cost of food is the culprit of the food waste problem. The rationale behind this is that people have increased both the quality and the number of their crops due to advanced agricultural technologies. As a result, the price of food in shops and restaurants has reduced significantly, which acts as a precursor of large quantities of food. Secondly, people mostly order food items more than they need. The justification for this is that they want to taste different delicious meals. Consequently, it becomes quite difficult for them to finish all ordered dishes, which could give rise to food throw away.
In order to address the aforementioned problems, some approaches should be administered. The first measure is that restaurants should make their customers think twice about what dishes they are going to order. This can be done by imposing a heavy fine on diners who order too many dishes but can not finish them. Therefore, people would have to consider carefully before they order any meals. The second method is that hotel owners should reduce the quantity of food being served to customers. Nearly 50% of food wasted, which can be reduced at restaurants if the quantity of served food is decreased by 20% than its current quantity, is a case in point. As a consequence, people can order as many dishes as they want without worrying about any wastage.
In conclusion, it is evident that people nowadays waste a ton of food purchased from stores and restaurants. There are some justifications for this phenomenon, and some feasible solutions should be deployed to deal with this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 73
- The table illustrates the all time top Olympics medals in several sports and the line graph depicts the number of rewards earned by five different countries in all Olympics 84
- In some countries around the world the government makes higher education free for everyone Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95356037152 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76944978335 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551083591331 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3539330686 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440579366974 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136483648147 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903726566048 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25663999469 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652405333496 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.