In some countries around the world, men and women are having babies late in life.
What are the reasons?
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
With paradigm shifts in social beliefs and people’s fascination with their careers, having children later in life has been delayed by many couples. This essay discusses the major reasons for this trend, and I believe that the merits outweigh the drawbacks.
There are a number of reasons leading to the trend of giving birth at later stages of life. First, in order to compete in the job market, many couples choose to focus on time, effort, and money on their careers. This is because delaying parenthood enables couples to work no longer hours and with higher commitment, resulting in better salaries and wages. Second, many young people nowadays understand the magnitude of child-rearing responsibility. For example, feeding babies and teaching them that require a great deal of patience and hard work, which discouraged many would-be parents.
It is true that late childbearing can have both advantages and disadvantages. As for the upside, those who delay starting a family can have time to get more done, either at work or in life, making them happier overall. In fact, studies have shown that people who have the time to do and travel more when they are young have a higher level of happiness than those who do not. Nevertheless, giving birth later in life does pose certain risks that might affect a woman's health as well as her baby’s health. As a result, it has been shown that a late-born child is more likely to suffer some birth defects such as heart disabilities or intellectual disabilities.
In conclusion, although there are some negative aspects of having children late in life the positive points outweigh the negative ones. I believe that it is a great idea to mutually decide and move a step ahead because it is a lifetime decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | linhchang | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-10 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | Jenna Vu | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | LUCIALUSO | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017 100
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 66
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 11
- Giving detailed descriptions of crimes in newspapers and on television media should be restricted To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Full time university students should spend a lot of time studying but it is essential to be involved in other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96296296296 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64291534682 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3651013391 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205024156788 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646655448355 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571370147377 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116337792417 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519388521495 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96296296296 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64291534682 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3651013391 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205024156788 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646655448355 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571370147377 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116337792417 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519388521495 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.