In some countries, children are expected to study more time both in and after school. Advantages and disadvantages of this trend.
Nowadays young students in some nations are supposed to increase studying time not only in classes but also after those. While some people strongly support this method, it still remains discussions that children should not spend too much time on learning, which could accidentally cause unexpectedly harm to them. In my opinion, I agree that students in young ages should be taught how to using effectively their available time at school instead of rising their time to study.
The main advantage of investing more time on gaining knowledge is giving children chance to broaden their horizon. The human’s information source is infinite leading to the more the students learn, the easier their life could be. Moreover, pupils normally are expected by their parents to get excellent mark at school, which could give them more opportunity to enter popular and remarkable schools in the future.
On the other hand, rising time at school has many disadvantages which could damage both physical and mental health of children. Firstly, young students might be stressful and exhausted if they spent too much time on studying at both school and home, which results in their heathy life is affected. Secondly, the social life of the pupils is damaged when it takes considerable time to stay at the same place and learn by themselves that leads to an uneffectively communicated society. In addition, knowledge is the only fact that decide the children’s life or success, they also need to reach the common sense, social skills, etc.
To sum up, learning is necessary for every single person not only the children but pupils should not be forced to study too much that they need to have a balance life between playing, communicating and learning.
- In some countries, children are expected to study more time both in and after school. Advantages and disadvantages of this trend. 78
- Many universities and colleges these days offer distance learning programs instead of face-to-face courses. Do you think the advantages of this new approach outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09756097561 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64285656864 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588850174216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.0915529165 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0909090909 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279508027781 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106179521928 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585821537784 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152593451586 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572255731702 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.