In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?
With the rapid development in current society, traffic congestion is always a heated topic among the public. In some nations, governments have imposed a congestion tax during peak time. Personally, I strongly believe this policy is a positive development.
On the one hand, imposing a congestion tax is beneficial to the public in several aspects. To begin with, such a policy will decrease the number of using private car dramatically. For example, folks may avoid driving a car to work at the peak time in order to save money. Besides, this also reduces the emission of carbon dioxide from private cars. Furthermore, the increased tax revenue will not only benefit governments but the public also get involved. For instance, the government could use this public money to construct more effective transport and to run a more efficient traffic system in order to solve the traffic issue completely.
On the other hand, some negative consequence may be triggered by executing the tax penalty in some nations. Firstly, the hasty tax penalty may impose a heavy financial burden on some families. In addition, people who living or working in remote areas that normally a private car is a sole choice they have. Additionally, the prices of products may rise because of the increasing cost of products transportation will eventually apportion on every single product we buy.
In conclusion, although the policy of the tax penalty in peak time maybe not ideal that may have some negative impact in some particular groups, the importance of this solution cannot be ignored. From my point of view, I totally believe people could gain many profits from it and it is an absolutely good solution in recent society.
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 61
- The line graph shows the average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 74
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, may, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10283687943 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77512573969 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59219858156 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2947632045 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264722017713 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085562992728 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678700914576 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159455758404 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071957103322 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.