Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world. To what extent is this a positive or negative trend?
In this globalized world, trade has been flourished and many countries import and export their product. This trend is also in the food sector; therefore, the food self sufficiency rate is decreasing in many states. In the following essay, I would argue that this might be a negative trend.
First of all, there is a high risk of insufficient food production. For example, the Japanese food self sufficiency rate is 38% in 2020. Since this is a low proportion, it is conveyed as a serious situation on newspapers or TV news programs. According to them, in some case such as natural disaster or any emergency, the import from the other nations might be stopped. As a consequence, the citizens would experience deficiency of the provisions and in the worst case, a large number of people will starve to death. Fortunately, Japan is not in that situation yet, but there is a risk in deed. To sum up, to rely heavily on other nations’ supply is dangerous.
Second of all, on the other hand, it might be beneficial for consumers who only want immediate profit. Typically, products that is mass-produced in foreign countries and imported are cheaper than those produced in their own nations. This means that the poor layer of society may find it advantageous to have cheaper products. However, this is just a optimistic perspective and might not helpful for society.
In my conclusion, there is a high risk of deficiency in an emergency even it is beneficial for an immediate profit. Therefore, I believe that the trend that countries do not produce food in their states is negative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Koi | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Luisjackiet | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Luisjackiet | 61 | view |
- It is not necessary to travel to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that the best way to discourage smoking is to make smoking illegal in public places Other people say that this is not enough and that other measures are needed Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 56
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 67
- Some people say that parents shoud encourage thier children to take parts in organized group activities in thier free time others say that it s important for them to learn how occupay themselves on their own 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...f the provisions and in the worst case, a large number of people will starve to death. Fortunatel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the poor layer of society may find it advantageous to have cheaper products. H...
^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cheaper products. However, this is just a optimistic perspective and might not he...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, therefore, for example, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86797749722 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559259259259 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3317614798 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258896447652 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720295341449 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553458829804 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146028874498 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721548342642 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.