Some countries are struggling with an increase in crime rates. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The rise in criminal activity has been bothering some nations. Some people argue that putting an increased number of law enforcement agencies on the roads is the most effective solution in reducing crime. In my opinion, I think this is not entirely correct because if you go out on the street with all the police, it will ruin the beauty of the city and very few people will dare to go out.
Cops are essential to maintain discipline in the community. They use deterrent measures and their experience in crime prevention to reduce the number of young people gathering to cause disorder in the city. Their presence on the streets gives pedestrians a feeling of safety. For example, due to the increasing crime rate, the police force needs to strengthen its measures and strategies to reduce the crime rate, not only some countries have high crime rates but almost all countries. All countries in the world have very high crime rates.
Therefore, we need to take strong measures to prevent and reduce the crime levels. Instead of arranging so many policemen on the street, the state should instead install more cameras on deserted roads as well as roads that are often very crowded. Because cameras are like the eyes of the police, they can help police track criminals and also help police detect people who engage in criminal activities in time to prevent them. As well as strengthening penalties to deter serious crimes such as large fines and higher penalties if recidivism.
In conclusion, I personally do not think that arranging many policemen on the street but this will make the beauty of the city less because if foreign tourists come to visit and see many policemen on the street, they will not dare to come out road again. Thus, I hope that the government will take better measures to protect people's safety and strictly handle dangerous crimes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | gianggiangvn | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | daidang869 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Koi | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | cleee | 73 | view |
- Different people have different approaches to life Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences Which category do you fall into and why 80
- The treat of nuclear power weapons maintains world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 84
- Nowadays a lot of people change the way of smoking from conventional cigarettes to electronic ones Discuss advantages and disadvantages of this statement 73
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and higher penalties if recidivism. In conclusion, I personally do not think...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86163522013 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47384962452 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9969386974 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349261282944 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968587430477 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792787733616 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188830967896 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078167291101 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and higher penalties if recidivism. In conclusion, I personally do not think...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86163522013 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47384962452 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9969386974 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349261282944 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968587430477 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792787733616 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188830967896 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078167291101 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.