In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In today’s world, the number of people suffering from health issues such as diabetes, obesity, heart disease, i.e. due to junk food is increasing very fast. For that reason, many people think that the junk food producers should be taxed higher as it could be used in public health service, whereas, others believe that charging high tax might not solve the issue. In my opinion, the government should impose a higher tax on this sort of food although there are some underlying counter-arguments involved with it.
As we can see, opting for a healthy lifestyle is a choice, and clearly not an obligation. Moreover, it relies on that particular individual, if someone really cares about his own well-being he or she may automatically choose to pursue good habits. For example, consuming high sugar foods and living a sedentary life is an individual choice and he or she has his or her own independence to do it. Thus, liberty plays an important role here no one can influence or manipulate such things to anybody.
Moreover, the majority of junk meals contain a lot of chemical additives and unhealthy products that might cause stomach problems. This is because of the fact that not only does not this nutrition have any vitamins that, in turn, support immune system but also they are made from unhealthy stuff that might not be perceived by human's organism. Therefore, a person is likely to experience a lot of stomach-aches and their level of metabolism will be reduced. As a result of government intervention prices for fast-food will be increased that, in turn, is likely to discourage consumers to purchase more.
In conclusion, the authority should tax the fast-food chain to make it helpful for the people in medical need although issue regarding the scarcity of alternative should come into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...k food producers should be taxed higher as it could be used in public health servi...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...t might cause stomach problems. This is because of the fact that not only does not this nutrition have a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...hy stuff that might not be perceived by humans organism. Therefore, a person is likely...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99669966997 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83357887724 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630363036304 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.6042070637 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0833333333 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279053760883 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921214855937 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793297398826 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153679264228 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944899674578 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.