In some countries an increasing number of people suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary. for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In today's developing era, the increasing popularity of fast food seem to be an unstoppable trend. As a result of this issue, a significant number of people in some country have health diseases. From my point of view, I partly agree that the government should increase the tax on fast food for the following reasons.
On the one hand, tax increase on junk food has benefit. The higher prices can help to reduce the desire to eat unhealthy food. This will make fast food unaffordable for some people and force them to prepare meals at home. Despite the inconvenience, it is beneficial for consumer's health because the home made food have less fat with good ingredients. However, lower income people eat more junk food than wealthier people. The reason for this is fast food is cheaper than healthy produce. Many families cannot afford to buy fresh food or pay higher taxes on fast food. For them, fast food is not a choice but a necessity. If they have to pay more, this would be a burden for them. Because of that, the government should consider carefully before taking any decision.
On the other hand, the fund from higher taxes could be used to improve the medical facilities.
Being over reliant on unhealthy food have make people suffer from many serious illnesses such as obesity, heart disease and so forth. Because of that, it will create pressure and make the hospital overloaded. Thus, it would be necessary for raise this amount of money from the producer and consumer of junk food to have a better medical system.
To sum up, imposing the tax on fast foods will help the medical community and decrease the popularity of lower income consumer. But if the governments really want to reduce the consumption of junk foods, making healthy products more affordable is the best solution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, thus, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81935483871 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47782254784 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3769638538 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6315789474 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390362671033 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125557550938 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649094486986 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202065046563 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116736288655 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.