In some countries, it can be difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs, despite their experience. What do you think are the causes of this problem, and what measures could be taken to solve it?
Nowadays, mostly every company is recruiting the younger people. As they think that they are more efficient in their work, hence, it engenders to mammoth consortium of older masses face a problem to find job. There are several reasons of this problem along with, some solutions as well to curb with this problem. I will try to enunciate in upcoming paragraph.
To begin with, technology is becoming part of every individual's life, though, it arises obstacles in the path of senior people. Usually, every industry uses different technology from which old masses are not familiar, hence, they do not get job. Furthermore, the main focus of authorities are to give job to unemployed youngsters which leads to less work opportunities for senior people. Moreover, it is undeniable verity that young people are more agile than the senior citizen. Even some companies claimed that they are ready to give chores to elder people, but they demand a hefty amount of salary, which become a reason that the industries give more opportunities to youngsters.
However, every problem has solution, therefore, there are multifarious solution. Primarily, legal authorities can levy rule to make sure the jobs for old age. For instance, government can start organisations and industries to offer jobs which need experienced old employees. Moreover, they can support and reserve proportion of seats for elder people in every sector of industries. Ultimately government can also make senior citizens familiar with technology by providing them knowledge with the help of seminars.
To sum up, to cope with this problem, government should work on these solutions which are discussed above. Even, industries must give jobs to senior citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...h, technology is becoming part of every individuals life, though, it arises obstacles in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
..., they do not get job. Furthermore, the main focus of authorities are to give job to unemp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, even so, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30656934307 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77967091733 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.092814283 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11178113668 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382239122446 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336739376184 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730002843896 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322036634475 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.