In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of a house or a building they are living in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
Along with the advance of civilizations, history more or less gradually pulls back its original position when there is a current trend to unveil the history of the living place carried by its owners. The wish to have a safe and peaceful life as well as to be close to their home has urged most homeowners into the expedition of finding the historical truths, which are likely to be performed through hunting information from surrounding people or even the local government.
When it comes to the reasons for tracing historical events eventuating in the living space, the belief to avoid omen as well as the strong desire to feel close to the home must be taken into consideration. First, a rising stereotype emerging thousand years ago regarding the impact of the shelter on the owners’ prosperity has been widely accepted. People in some countries heavily admit that they believe in ghosts and some other invisible power that probably accommodates in their homes; by advanced searching for historical information, they are able to avoid the influences of these surviving unrecognized agents on their mental and physical health, from which they can have a safe place to live. Second, another widespread assumption for this searching behavior is the hope to feel and be close to the concrete building. In fact, a house is not just a house, it is a home where people devote their time and emotion. Therefore, it is understandable when people willingly spend time searching for as much information regarding their living space as a sign of respect and appreciation.
However, lightening some historical facts of a building is such an arduous task when it requires more time and endeavors to carry out. Fortunately, the source of information obtained from surrounding elder people and the local authority seems to be authentic when they are considered two prevalent choices. On the one hand, those living in the same neighborhood for a long period have witnessed significant changes in every corner of their place. Hence, they are known as the living Wikipedia to find out what did happen with a building. Furthermore, the older they are, the truthful the information is. This is because there is no reason for them to report false information to those in need. On the other hand, local authorities have the responsibility to supply essential information to their residents who are seeking help. With a large information source saved from generation to generation, tracking the events occurring in an area is feasible with the authority.
In conclusion, it is suitable to unravel past events happening in a living block due to the aforementioned personal purposes by asking neighbors as well as the committee for help.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...on. First, a rising stereotype emerging thousand years ago regarding the impact of the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y can have a safe place to live. Second, another widespread assumption for this s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 449.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0579064588 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89731814071 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530066815145 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7260244448 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.588235294 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4117647059 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41176470588 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260291532281 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738727173632 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504962593308 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134268011722 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614918568577 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.