In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this? How can people research it?
There is a growing tendency among citizens of several countries to investigate the background of their place of residence. This, in my opinion, is brought about by both tangible and intangible motives and methods of investigation may vary.
Firstly, research into the history of the house can be done out of concern for its physical condition. Examining the past of the building enables inhabitants to make better maintenance plans by equipping them with such information as construction date and site, or building materials. Only with insights into the past of the house can homeowners make alterations to it in the present.
In parallel with that physical incentive is the spiritual aspect. When an accommodation is bought or rented, it remains a property until the owner feels an emotional connection to call it home. This connectedness can be established while they scrutinize its background. There is also a deeply-embedded superstitious belief that if a house witnessed a tragic death, remnants of the deceased soul might still linger, passing misfortune on the current inhabitants. Therefore, knowledge of the house prior to their residency instills in the homeowners a sense of reassurance.
There can be two effective ways in which the history of a building is unfolded. If the desired information is physical features, looking up in the public records is the optimal approach. Such records are kept by the property manager, whose contact is readily accessible. On the other hand, if unrecorded incidents are sought after, the neighbors, especially the elders, are reliable sources of information to exploit, with several years of experience residing in the neighborhood.
To conclude, as owners are more fascinated by the past of their building, they can easily collect such information either by recorded data or talking to the elderly neighbors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research it 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and methods of investigation may vary. Firstly, research into the history of th...
^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'accommodation'.
Suggestion: accommodation
...incentive is the spiritual aspect. When an accommodation is bought or rented, it remains a prope...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34013605442 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11701986772 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.861600518 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168354973678 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498663690423 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526331210015 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829099440982 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369733873551 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.