In some countries, more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is justifiable that family is one of the uppermost supporters in mankind’s life. Therefore joint families have hitherto been exiting in many Asian countries where young adults tend to stay with their parents even after accomplishing their studies and getting a stable job. In my estimation, I strongly believe that the merits of living with parents outweigh its demerits as there are a plethora of advantages of this trend including emotional support, household chores, and financial stability.
First and foremost, the manifest benefit involved in staying with family after graduating from university and having an occupation is that subsequent generations are offered a stress-free lifestyle which means that they are less likely to deal with financial matters. To exemplify, an adolescent who lived within their home with parents would probably withstand lesser pressure in relation to utility bills and housework, which would end up having not only a remarkable buoyancy but also productivity for true effectiveness in their own life. The gravity of this advantage is extremely fierce due to the decisive contribution to mental and emotional health.
Contrary to popular belief, the independence ability is unable to refine if young teenagers live in their family home. This is because there are just a few numbers of opportunities for them to experience divergent dilemmas and difficult situations that are parts of maturation and progression. In particular, parents will be the first ones who shield their children from negative repercussions and hardships when every member of the family lives with each other, which unintentionally takes away the youngsters’ hard lessons that life has to offer. Conversely, this drawback is still able to improve for the better as long as young individuals cope with such negativities with persistence when they move out.
On balance, despite having confinement in autonomy, living with family is much more lucrative when it comes to natural remedies for psychological resilience because of the sensitivity that kinfolks have. As a contradiction of sorts, it is the mental condition that ultimately makes life with family more advantageous than disadvantageous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 89
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 95
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news and would it be better if more good news was reported 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...uppermost supporters in mankind’s life. Therefore joint families have hitherto been exiti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ehold chores, and financial stability. First and foremost, the manifest benefit...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, if, so, still, therefore, as to, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51612903226 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05234784071 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624633431085 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7055736046 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.75 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4166666667 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296933526844 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984729361543 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072220395262 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180874985069 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573594284376 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.