In some countries, only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music. Why? Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more?
With the proliferation of a multitude of different sorts of music, classical type and its concerts have no longer reigned supreme among the youngsters. From my point of view, there are a myriad of reasons for this situation and I contend that young adults should get incentives to partake in classical music more frequently.
First of all, the lack of interest in classical concerts and songs can boil down to several factors. The first thing to notice is that old songs can be obsolete and out of style for energetic and lively young people. Undoubtedly, the youth’s taste in music can be catered to by upbeat songs with trendy lyrics and the like. Classical ones including folk music, traditional songs or even opera, which amuse the eldery or the middle-aged, may not meet this style. Another thing worth mentioning is that because of the prevalence of pop, rock or rap songs on the Internet and social media, youngsters would be more inclined to listen to them. As a result, they will be less likely to get exposed to classical forms of music.
However, I advocate that young adults should pay more attention to classical shows and music as it can foster and uphold the culture and music history. Classical music is, without a doubt, a representative for the former means of music industry and it offers the traditional way of enjoying music. If the young learn more about it, they can have better understanding about how music has transformed and their playlists can be more manifold. Moreover, some societies even convey messages and values about life, the previous generations and the like through opera or classical songs, so knowing about them is a way to better preserve and acquire a country’s history.
In conclusion, there are numerous contributors to the young being less intrigued in classical music including the differences in style and the influential ubiquity of the internet. However, I am convinced that it is justifiable for them to learn more about this type of music as it enhances cultural values and facilitates better understanding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ers. From my point of view, there are a myriad of reasons for this situation and I con...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, another thing, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99710982659 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76243887332 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0717114558 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359125154849 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134956265148 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634864762825 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235122862534 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445965216023 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.