In some countries, only few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music. Why? Should young people be encourage to attend and learn more?
In many parts of the world, there is a common trend that the young show their lackadaisical attitude towards classical music. Even though this tendency can be argued for some reasons, young people should still expose themselves to this music genre.
The young tend to become less enthusiastic about partaking in classical music shows or playing this music type due to two main reasons. Firstly, they may find it complicated to fully enjoy classical music. Indeed, most publicly known classical performances are likely to be delivered way by prodigious talents, such as Bach, Mozart, who tend to convey some implications and sophistication through their work. Hence, young people may perceive that this genre requires a specific amount of musical knowledge as well as the understanding of composers. Furthermore, classical music having no clear lyrics commonly seen in other types can make listeners more confused about its content. Secondly, classical music concert tickets are often sold at high prices. In my country, such music shows tend to be targeted at high-income audiences since these are often held in a high-class venue and featured with renowned orchestras. Consequently, the prices of entry tickets do not seem pocket-friendly to the young, who may have circumscribed incomes or prefer a more affordable leisure pursuit, such as movies or an acoustic music show. Generally, the elusive concepts of classical music and lack of affordability may be hurdles for young people to experience such a music kind.
However, exposure to classical music can be beneficial to listeners; therefore, the young should enjoy and learn more about it. The first benefit is that classical music can nurture people’s state of mind. In fact, most pieces of this music genre seem to sound soothing and mellifluous, which can provide its audiences with a sense of relief. Simultaneously, it is scientifically reported that classical music can boost human creativity, thanks to its lyricless form, listeners can draw up their own imaginary scenarios that can couple with a certain music piece. What’s more, is that the young who tend to pursue their careers in the music industry can leverage classical music to sharpen their knowledge breadth, and taste. In fact, classical music dates back to the eleventh century and has a relation with most modern-day music genres. Thus, no matter which music types these young people may opt for, would-be musicians can certainly adapt parts of classical music into their works. Young people should get more exposed to classical music due to mentality and knowledge-related benefits.
In conclusion, it is believed by many that classical music seems to have lost its glories among the young whose interest in it tends to be reduced by some reasons. I believe that they should seize every opportunity to experience classical music.
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper as the result more adults work at home and children study at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 56
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encourage to attend and learn more 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 458.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27510917031 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82325470828 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532751091703 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0477295325 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.047619048 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469184248643 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182779288793 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798183809843 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323637968848 0.151304729494 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468152151425 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.