Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that oral communication holds more power than information exchanged in writing. From my viewpoint, even though verbal communication exerts certain benefits, communicating by writing serves a greater role.
It is true that speaking-based communication can bring in several advantages. Firstly, this method of delivering information can allow people convenience. In fact, through verbal communication, people can convey a great deal of information in a short period of time. Additionally, they can partake in a conversation with basic means needed, for instance phones. Another benefit worth mentioning is that oral communication seem to facilitate better mutual understanding. Indeed, participants engaging in a face-to-face conversation are likely to stay aware of nuances hidden in their partners’ voice tones, facial expressions and body language. Hence, they can interpret implicit meaning or emotions in what others say in order to devise sensible responses.
However, there are several justifications that support my viewpoint. The major benefit of this avenue of communication is that it can ensure information records, compared to the speaking channel that can leave certain significant information neglected. This means that by communication through writing, for instance emails or paper letters, information can be revised and retrieved with ease. Another remarkable advantage is that writing can ensure legal validity under certain circumstances. For instance, the effectiveness of writing-based communication can be emphasized in the business world. Particularly, most contractual information related to finances or stakeholders’ rights, obligations is required to be stored in the form of legal documents with the aim of ensuring its legal force, while spoken footprints cannot be legitimate when it comes to settling disputes.
In conclusion, communication in the form of speaking can be convenient and improve mutual interpretation. However, my firm conviction is that written communication can be more significant owing to its pivotal role in recording information and guaranteeing legal effect.
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encourage to attend and learn more 73
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encourage to attend and learn more 73
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper as the result more adults work at home and children study at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... a great deal of information in a short period of time Additionally they can partake in a conv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n order to devise sensible responses However there are several justifications that s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81433224756 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32667231912 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5667752443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 307.0 20.2975951904 1512% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1785.0 106.682146367 1673% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 307.0 20.7667163134 1478% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 91.0 7.06120827912 1289% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178524066368 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178524066368 0.084324248473 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137277980436 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584908274564 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 159.4 13.0946893788 1217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -265.51 50.2224549098 -529% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 126.6 11.3001002004 1120% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 17.9 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.9 8.58950901804 278% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 68.0 9.78957915832 695% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 124.8 10.1190380762 1233% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 125.0 10.7795591182 1160% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.