In some countries, secondary schools provide a general education of a range of education. In other countries, children have a narrow range of subjects relating to a particular career. Which one do you think is more appropriate for the modern world?
To receive a comprehensive education before going to college is an essential part for many high schoolers in areas where education is a more test-or academics-oriented. However, an alternative to personal ambition is offered to them that they choose to graduate from a high school which provides curriculum of a relatively low diversity but centered on vocational training. Given that students are of different learning and thinking different, either of both diplomas could be a key in equipping them with adequacy in life success.
Admittedly, high school is a place more than job training. Learning multiple subjects exposes young mind to holistic understanding of different fields of study, including core subjects like maths or selective ones like painting. This comprehensive education allows them to think and decide differently about what field they might desire to indulge themselves in as professionals or what study they expect to pursue in college. Additionally, workplace changes along with varied times, educating young minds to be adaptive and flexible instead of being stringent in dealing with changes in future is the need of time when high school students study in different classes. Besides in real life, the acceptance of graduates from high schools setting mixed programmes by prestigious universities is far higher.
However, it is not feasible or practical to shape every child into an academia or scholar through secondary schooling, as some other students show talents and interests in technical or vocational courses like carpentry or culinary arts. Regular and traditional courses, if added to daily schedules, do not agree with their future planning, to get employed right after graduation. Narrow as vocational related courses may sound, technical education nevertheless expands students' options that they can go to college or find a satisfactory job with a standard diploma. A main focus on vocational training is even common in some special secondary schools which aim at hands-on learning so that graduates follow their own trades.
In conclusion, it is hard to identify which educational mechanism is optimal for high school students. If vocational education is directly tied to what they pursue, then forcing them to sit behind a desk all day is a waste of time and investment. But be that as it may, when children want to get themselves in campus life, a traditional education remains relevant.
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Today advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists are still valued high such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 67
- Today advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists are still valued high such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 56
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...sfactory job with a standard diploma. A main focus on vocational training is even common i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...traditional education remains relevant.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3681462141 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00719368752 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595300261097 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0959304682 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.066666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193974536722 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644945353789 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349580505635 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120322984051 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164002658757 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.