Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There have been opponents against the permission of any form of weapons by law enforcement in legitimate situations, claiming that it inevitably escalates violence and crime. This essay will examine the arguments against the use of forceful interventions and concludes that while weapon use should be minimized wherever possible, it is sometimes a necessary last resort.
According to the protesters, granting powers of using weapons to law enforcement officers endanger the lives and safety of innocent civilians and can only lead to increased violence and other aggressive responses. The reason behind it is that allowing weapon use by police officers is an invitation for excessive use of force and brutality by both police and suspects. Furthermore, giving them the right to use guns under certain circumstance will only serve to institutionalize racism and discrimination. as minorities will more likely be disproportionately targeted by armed police officers.
In contrast, it cannot be entirely accurate to solely blame armed police officers for causing more violence and crime. There are situations which need the use of firearms by law enforcement to deter potential crimes and safeguard the public safety. Such scenario may include situations where armed individuals pose a clear and present danger to the community. In such a circumstance, a police officer's ability to use their firearm in defense of themselves and innocent bystanders is the practice of combating criminal activities. It should also be noted that the mere fact that police officers carry weapons is often sufficient to deter violent individuals or groups from taking further action, known as deterrence effect. In short words, weaponizing police officers help reduce crime rates.
In conclusion, we cannot prohibit the permission of the use of forceful interventions completely due to the possibility of escalation in violence. It is crucial that police departments regularly train their officers to minimize the likelihood of excessive use of force and abuse of their authority and only resort to weapon use when all other methods have failed.
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...itutionalize racism and discrimination. as minorities will more likely be dispropo...
^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...itutionalize racism and discrimination. as minorities will more likely be dispropo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, may, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50304878049 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06615627812 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557926829268 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9427387143 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.928571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1186061476 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046247090007 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359736202576 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070673997539 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441543208698 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.