In some countries, there are not enough medical and educational facilities in rural areas. Some people believe newly graduated teachers and doctors should be sent to rural areas to work for some time, while others suggest that people should be free to choose a place to work. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people have different views on the fresh graduates should be sent to help them in the inadequate educational system and health care services in the countryside. While others think that they have the freedom to choose the place they work. From my perspective, I believe that both have their pros and cons with the reasons.
To begin with, most people are willing to help the poverty in several countries. In other words, we cannot force the fresh graduate to work there. In the countryside in Africa, for example, many doctors and teachers are voluntary given a hand when they faced difficulty. Therefore, if the fresh graduates are following senior level, they can get a different type of knowledge to them, meantime can have a close relationship to the local citizen. However, new things are they learn is totally different from their institution. Besides, some drawbacks indicate that scarcity of facilities in the rural areas, most volunteers cannot adapt to the harsh environment and then frequently sick due to lack of basic, they are facing inconvenient. Moreover, long-term services can carry several problems like psychological and mental influence.
On the other hand, some people think that they should choose a workplace based on their desire. Undeniable, most situations have been happening until recently. As a person who has the power right to choose the things they want. Furthermore, the right working area can bring them to feel happier than force to work somewhere. However, the social problem could be reduced. Additionally, when the people are working in their favourite environment, they would have confidence and responsibility to their job task, in contrary, forcing them to certain places might arouse many troubles. Consequently, the worker should have choices depend on the workplace.
In conclusion, the forcing way for new worker service in rural areas is not appropriate for nowadays people, they might have choices to choose as a volunteer work there or free to find another workplace. Therefore, I believe both of them have the positive and negative sides.
- Many developing countries place a lot of importance on tourism Why is this Do you think that this is a positive or negative development 67
- A growing population is a big problem in many countries Should the government provide new homes in the cities or country side 61
- In some countries there are not enough medical and educational facilities in rural areas Some people believe newly graduated teachers and doctors should be sent to rural areas to work for some time while others suggest that people should be free to choose 78
- The only way to solve the increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ealth care services in the countryside. While others think that they have the freedom...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ons have been happening until recently. As a person who has the power right to cho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23668639053 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76100660131 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.3084371717 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1578947368 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256332155328 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726730811065 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710803704424 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165979588753 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043171992336 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.