In today's highly competitive market, the unemployment rate is higher every day so people worldwide are focusing solely on earning money but do not care about childbirth or having their first child at a later stage in life. This essay aims to point out the reasons and prove that the drawbacks of this outweigh the merits.
There are numerous arguments that lead to this problem, one of them is young children really affect parents' life because they seem to cause difficulties such as crying at midnight or refusing to go to school. Through this, their parents might be feeling tired because of work but also face to those things can lead to mental issues and dangerous consequent that unworthy. Moreover, the financial burden of upbringing a child is growing significantly. It is evident from rising inflation and increasing costs of essential needs like housing, food, healthcare, and clothing for babies. It is understandable why young couples choose to focus on saving money and securing a reliable source of income before starting a family.
From my point of view, this trend is negative not only in family connections but also in the parents’ health. When parents delay having children, it can result in a significant age difference between them and their offspring. As the generation gap widens, adults may struggle to understand and adopt their child's needs and potential familial conflicts that can strain relationships. In addition, having the first child after 35-aged, the mother's health will face an increased likelihood of miscarriage or complications during labour, while newborn babies are more likely to suffer from innate health problems. This can make the mature child face up with dangerous issues and it is also a fear for the father and mother.
In conclusion, many couples are choosing to have children later in life due to financial pressures and a desire for better parenting skills. Additionally, I believe this trend has negative implications for family bonds and overall well-being. To address this issue, governments should offer incentives to encourage younger couples to start families and have children earlier in life.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 56
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Favourite leisure activities of teenagers in Canada 74
- The maps below show changes in the city of Nelson in recent times 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mothers'' or 'mother's'?
Suggestion: mothers'; mother's
...ving the first child after 35-aged, the mothers health will face an increased likelihoo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, really, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2183908046 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76001521266 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623563218391 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9934338535 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.066666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194574132275 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595509987023 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436236989548 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121543645027 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660655231222 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.