It has been stated that the younger generation should be forced to use a gap year for working and traveling before embarking on higher education. This essay will shed light on both the demerits and merits of this perception before concluding that the latter notion can bring far more benefits.
On the one hand, delaying study in college after graduating high school is associated with some negative effects. First and foremost, those who choose to work before taking study in university could face a struggle to keep up with their peers when they come back to school. This is because, after working a long time, they might have more time to familiar with studying than their classmate, which could lose their driving to study. Another salient justification is that traveling can put a strain on the financial stability of their parents. More specifically, if students who don’t have income or enough savings before traveling, they might need financial assistance from parents.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned discourse, the drawbacks are pale in comparison with the profound benefits of taking a gap year. One of the most gains is that this experience could enrich student’s life before pursuing a university degree. Due to working or travelling, students could acquire more insight and information about job, and culture, giving them have more heightened awareness of their dream future. As a result, they would have informed decisions about career aspirations before choosing a major in university. Another positive impact is that students could cultivate practice school as well as instill the value of working, allowing them more competitive compared to other students who solely on studying in college.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that there are some downsides of having a gap year for students including studying further and the burden of finances, the upsides are significantly weightier. If this trend is preferred, it can bring benefits to the labor workforce in the future.
- The graph shows information about the number of people in Australia who use Chinese Arabic Italian and Greek as their first language 73
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 78
- In some countries today many people decide to have their first child when they are older What are the reasons Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Experts say older people were happier and healthier in the past because they did more exercise and spent more time with family and friends whereas many now suffer from loneliness and health problems What are the causes of this and what are some solutions 89
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.275 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79563694665 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3702176884 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157893830259 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557695049414 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389401185417 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102024465503 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229391181317 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.275 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79563694665 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3702176884 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157893830259 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557695049414 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389401185417 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102024465503 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229391181317 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.