some education system make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until the leave school. Uwhat are the benefits of each system? which is better?
One school of thoughts holds that some educational paradigms make 15 year-old learners attend a limited number of subjects, while others opine that pupils are forced to study an etensive curriculum until they graduate. From my perspectiv, both systems have their particular advantages, however, I am of the latter
On the one hand lerning a smaller range of subjects will bring useful benefits for students from the age of 15 in some ways. Initially, students would be provided with greater motivation when they study a subset of subjects. Obviously, if they choose favourite subjects, they will be expected to put more commitment for studying, thereby, heightening overall learning productivity instead of focusing on subjects that they are not interested in. Additionally, advocates for this kind of educational system claim that students could spend more time reducing stress relivers and having a chance to balance between studying and social life. In fact, physical activities would help them release pressureand recharge energ. This, to some extent, learners can increase their study eficiency.
On the other hand,I concur that the merits of attending a wide range of subjects for 15 year-old students are irrefutable. The firstobvious, they will acquire an extensive knowledge in different aspects and a comprehensive personal development. This is due to the fact that there are multiple subjects such as Math, Chemistry,... which provide pupils with broader understanding and perspectives. In the long run, this will enable to have a multi-dementional outlock on life or come up with innovative solutions in numerous fields. Another benefit of learning many subjects is offering students a competitive edge to apply for letter jobs. Obviously, they are taught a set of skills such as logical thinking, critical thinking: therefore, they equipped with various skills for better career prospects compared people who do not study various academic subjects
In brief, although studying a limited number of subjects is helpful, I believe that a program with various academic subjects exerts more potentially beneficial for a well-rounded student with better career path.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | phamnhung | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Rahat | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | phuongnguyen1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | xuananhle | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
One school of thoughts holds that some e...
^^^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... advantages, however, I am of the latter On the one hand lerning a smaller range ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs can increase their study eficiency. On the other hand,I concur that the meri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
... study eficiency. On the other hand,I concur that the merits of attending a w...
^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ultiple subjects such as Math, Chemistry,... which provide pupils with broader und...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...do not study various academic subjects In brief, although studying a limited nu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in brief, in fact, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51641791045 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94913287564 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.679417956 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302633678917 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922247368918 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739016418274 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178171502399 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220156944652 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.