Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave, believing this benefits the individual and the organization. Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Both employees and employers share a mutual interest in effective work arrangements. Among these is the rather polarizing unpaid sabbatical leave policy, which is supported by some people and rejected by others. Such opposite viewpoints will be elucidated in the following essay before a final conclusion is reached.
Proponents of the unpaid approach highlight its merits to individuals and companies. Given a fixed amount of unsubsidized sabbaticals, employees are encouraged to spend their time doing other activities, such as pursuing their hobbies and taking courses in fields of their interest. This level of freedom, in principle, results in workers returning to work, refreshed and more committed to their job. Oftentimes, this is a boon for companies. Aside from the consequent heightened productivity, companies do not suffer financial loss and it is easier for departments to downsize without having to dispense with the services of their employees.
However, there are convincing arguments in opposition to the unpaid leave proposal. The policy itself is more suited to academic settings, such as universities or research laboratories, as tasks in these workplaces are short-term and could be completed discreetly. In a majority of organizations, however, workers prefer their contracts to encompass paid leave as it ensures their earnings, and thus, life security. Without the appeal of this policy, it is likely that companies will lose their retention power as employees drift to companies with the paid sabbaticals’ competitive edge. As a result, while cost is reduced in some areas, expenses in recruiting and training new employees are incurred.
Having examined both views, it is in my conviction that the upsides of unpaid leave are outweighed by its pitfalls. What is more, while the policy is still of value, it is more compatible with workplaces in which job duties are short-term and not inextricably intertwined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-31 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-26 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
- The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days Do you agree with this statement 84
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- The practice of illegally hunting wild animals continues to cause concern in many countries particularly developing countries What are the causes of such hunting What are the effects on the animals and on the wider human society in these countries and bey 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, thus, while, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49666666667 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08027956884 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9886899367 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195705381434 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620121138803 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358363236065 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106121929649 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379537748271 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.