Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In today's atmosphere, it's disputed whether or not elementary school students should begin learning a foreign language. Students should acquire a foreign language in primary school, some people argue. In my opinion, the advantages much exceed the disadvantages.
The main argument against teaching children languages in elementary school is that it puts too much strain on them. That is the age when children learn not only the basics of math, science, and their native language, but they also discover the world around them. Pupils need time to relax and have fun; cramming too much information into their heads leaves them befuddled and stressed. There is simply too much homework and instruction for a young child to keep up with, and this could cause delays in the acquisition of their first language.
In addition, I believe this point of view has more good consequences. To begin with, studying a foreign language aids a child's brain development. Learning a new language activates areas of the brain that have never been used before, according to a study by the United Nations. To this end, teaching children a foreign language from an early age will benefit their brain development. Second, exposing a youngster to a foreign language at a young age will pay dividends as the child becomes older. A person's ability to communicate in more than one language opens doors for them in the job. As a result, your chances of landing the ideal employment are improved. For example, Infosys provides preference to its employees who are fluent in English while applying for jobs in the United States. Being comfortable and secure in one's ability to communicate in another language can only come from early exposure to that language.
To summarize, I believe that learning a foreign language as soon as possible has numerous advantages despite certain drawbacks.
- You are advised to spend about 20 minutes on this task The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the info
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 73
- Young people who commit serious crimes such as robbery or violent attacks should be punished in the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- When students move to a new school they sometimes face problems How can schools help these students with their problems Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
In todays atmosphere, its disputed whether or not elementary school students should begin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...dividends as the child becomes older. A persons ability to communicate in more than one...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 823, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...States. Being comfortable and secure in ones ability to communicate in another langu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, while, for example, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11803278689 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70040159455 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9589417208 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8235294118 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293820461809 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888354060947 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063915173373 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179127424449 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567935074785 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.