There are a few educationalists who have the opinion that a foreign language should be made fundamental during children's primary schooling. There are more pros than cons to this. This essay will highlight what can be the benefits of teaching a new language to primary level children and the associated downsides of this academic model.
When children gain exposure to a new language, they readily accept it and make it a part of their life. This typically happens when children have just been enrolled into school. Apart from easy acceptance, this tendency can also build their confidence in handling a foreign language which can ultimately open up thousand of career avenues for them in the future. Similarly, teaching a foreign language can have the advantage of kids appreciating a language from a different country with the potential impact of instilling a sense of understanding and acceptance of a foreign culture. For instance, we listen to a lot of english songs and watch movies. If we didn't know the language, we would not have accepted those people who speak that language. So we are able to revert ourselves to a state of equilibrium with each watch or listening.
On the other hand, when kids are made to learn a new language other than their own, this can put a strain on their academics. This may gradually result in a loss of interest in studies and trigger no new acquisition of knowledge or skills. On top that, our conception that a new language can promote equality can prove counterintuitive. What I mean by this is that children may start prioritizing foreign language over the language of their own. They might even embrace second language as being more comfortable for usage which can threaten national identity and culture in the long-run.
To sum up, children should be taught a non-native language only when they are able to understand the implications of them on our society, that is when they begin their secondary schooling because it can cause psychological stress to kids and also threaten our significant cultural norms and traditions.
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 70
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this overweigh its disadvantages 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...f english songs and watch movies. If we didnt know the language, we would not have ac...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, similarly, so, still, apart from, for instance, i mean, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99130434783 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84791422219 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0948876198 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220591687678 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741327195475 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522161509952 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137593854352 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222141955961 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.