some experts say that it is better for children to Hindi learning a foreign language at primary school rather than Secondary School. do you think so and take advantages and disadvantages with your opinion.
Nowadays, getting a command over the international languages since the earlier stages of life - is gaining more prevalence among the modern societies. Nevertheless, some traditionalists claim that these languages must be learnt by the students in or after the secondary schooling, because of some devastating impact such as many on the cultural language. Even, to my mind, the learning trend of many international languages at elementary School has a detrimental impact such as the cultural language extension.
to begin with, by learning and interacting with the foreign language, may refrain child to do these basic activities in their own cultural language. As a child cannot even speak, write, or read in their own national language, undoubtedly, due to the lake of knowledge. Not just this, sometimes, gradually they will become isolated from their own native language, and, in particular, this leads to the language extinction. Seen in this light, learnings the international language in the primary school has not just this, but many other pernicious impacts, as well.
On the other hand, the deeper and sound knowledge of foreign language indulge the confidence and fluency - about the language use - in the children. Additionally, these can prove as a positive promotion in the children's career, when, particularly they will appear for the international examinations and tests. consider, for example, as the research has borne out by the world educational Association that the many international exams are the piece of cake, especially for the German students due to the deeper knowledge of international language since the childhood. Thus, in today's stiff competitive world learning a foreign language from childhood, appears to be incontrovertible.
On a practical note, the government can work as a jointly with the educational Institutes and can introduce only one compulsory foreign language subject in the school curriculum. By this, the students have an exposure to the international language - which has definitely Stark benefits in later life - and can minimise its negative impact, without being said. Moreover, the parents can also encourage the children to watch International TV shows in order to improve their foreign language commands.
In a nutshell, the cited evidence supports my view that in spite of the profound impact of the foreign languages since the earlier age, it is vital to look after that it will not prove as a grave danger in the further life, in any terms. In the future, the aforementioned policy or the precise - governmental and parental - administration can emphasize the positive promotion of it, without any distractions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-23 | darshilbhayani92 | 73 | view |
- The manufacturing process of black tea. 73
- The tabular graph compares usage of rail transport system in 2007. 73
- Nowadays music and newspaper are available online what are the advantages and disadvantages explain with examples 54
- The comparison between marriage and divorce ratio in adults, between 1970 and 2000. 73
- Many people believe that government should have to pay for education and health service. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... as the cultural language extension. to begin with, by learning and interacting...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age indulge the confidence and fluency - about the language use - in the children...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consider
...e international examinations and tests. consider, for example, as the research has borne...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'in particular', 'such as', 'in spite of', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223849372385 0.247107183377 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.0962343096234 0.155533422707 62% => OK
Adjectives: 0.129707112971 0.0946595960268 137% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0460251046025 0.0501214627716 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0251046025105 0.0437548338989 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133891213389 0.122226691241 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0209205020921 0.0403226058552 52% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.13715418541 2.80594681477 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0230125523013 0.0326793684256 70% => OK
Particles: 0.00209205020921 0.00163938923432 128% => OK
Determiners: 0.138075313808 0.0861772015684 160% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0251046025105 0.021408717616 117% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00418410041841 0.011925033212 35% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2678.0 1933.35771543 139% => OK
No of words: 424.0 316.048096192 134% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31603773585 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20517956788 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377358490566 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320754716981 0.28420135186 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.254716981132 0.203846283523 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.172169811321 0.137316102897 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13715418541 2.80594681477 112% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.037074148 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516509433962 0.56093040696 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 58.3705287769 60.7387585426 96% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.5 20.7743622355 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3375125544 49.517814964 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.375 127.492653851 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7743622355 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0625 0.814263465372 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 58.5754716981 49.1944974215 119% => OK
Elegance: 2.2625 1.69124875643 134% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143323465152 0.332605444948 43% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153924672912 0.102741220458 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0621486229107 0.0668466124924 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.659951805259 0.534860350844 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137140906903 0.148594505496 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803954723112 0.134430193775 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428011070939 0.0742795772207 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.427050713954 0.324371583561 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0766169075193 0.0638462369009 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107447370214 0.228012699653 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296080231827 0.058150111329 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.4468937876 144% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.