Co2 emission in main four region in between 1967 and 2007.
The Line Chart depicts the comparison between the volume of carbon dioxide emitted by per person in four main regions, over a time course of 40 years, since 1957, measured in metric tonnes.
Over the period as a whole, the carbon dioxide emission rose abruptly by every person in Italy and Portugal whereas a significant fall was noticed in the Co2 emission from UK and Sweden, at the end of the year 2007.
In detail, in the year 1967, the Co2 emission by UK was at the peak, as emission ratio individually per person was roughly 11 metric tonnes. Meanwhile, the Co2 emission in Sweden was doubled than that of emitted by Italy, in the same year. Portugal was not a significant contributor in the emissions as only 1.8 metric tonnes Co2 emitted per person. After next 2 decades, in the year 1987, the same trend of Co2 emission was analysed in Italy and Portugal. In both of these regions, nearly 30% of rice confirmed in the case of Co2 emission and ended at 6.4 metric tonnes and 2.6 metric tonnes, respectively. However, the Co2 emission by Swedish people converged at this time with Italian emission - which showed a dramatic fall in the case of emission of Co2 in Sweden with minor elevation in the year 1977.
At the end of the year 2007, as the C o2 emission ratio in UK and Sweden diminished with compared to previous years, ended at 8.5 metric tonnes and 5.2 metric tonnes, respectively. In contrast, the Portugal emissions - in spite of the steeple rising in the Co2 emission - ratio was the same as in Sweden. However, with a noticeable rise, the Co2 emission per person in Italy ended at 7.8 metric tonnes, in the same year.
- nowadays University education is very expensive some people say that universities should reduce disease especially for less fortunate students of those coming from rural areas to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements? 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The tabular graph compares usage of rail transport system in 2007. 73
- Development of an island for tourism purposes. 84
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 84
Comments
Essay evaluation report by e-grader
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.30303030303 0.268076937826 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.0818181818182 0.116061578633 70% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0759168565197 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0333333333333 0.0366838410393 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.20303030303 0.155750635184 130% => OK
Participles: 0.0272727272727 0.0379272487307 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46861000079 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0030303030303 0.0210936926555 14% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121212121212 0.0948980150116 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0030303030303 0.00437022459523 69% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0030303030303 0.00967000014798 31% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1647.0 1161.00487805 142% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.9 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56418918919 5.90752243213 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73763899035 111% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.331081081081 0.337110787985 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.226351351351 0.247514529752 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.148648648649 0.171178102325 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0574324324324 0.112407865282 51% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46861000079 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422297297297 0.546246751206 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.3403465264 49.3433353143 82% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.9090909091 23.0094962315 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4438611424 42.9750493124 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.727272727 135.714022679 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 23.0094962315 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.689975730869 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 49.5442260442 47.7609492067 104% => OK
Elegance: 4.63157894737 2.94281807926 157% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346830681632 0.418131533498 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.245364599504 0.181151798455 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0502084134802 0.0850326197045 59% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.761207259998 0.706616315825 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135295601521 0.157042692854 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21336361662 0.228904883108 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422893229725 0.108899403657 39% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.590632669852 0.367819155151 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.187670762352 0.0812612215331 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248564050717 0.316326947829 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051049280205 0.0921553760075 55% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.02926829268 198% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.30303030303 0.268076937826 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.0818181818182 0.116061578633 70% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0759168565197 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0333333333333 0.0366838410393 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.20303030303 0.155750635184 130% => OK
Participles: 0.0272727272727 0.0379272487307 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46861000079 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0030303030303 0.0210936926555 14% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121212121212 0.0948980150116 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0030303030303 0.00437022459523 69% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0030303030303 0.00967000014798 31% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1647.0 1161.00487805 142% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.9 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56418918919 5.90752243213 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73763899035 111% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.331081081081 0.337110787985 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.226351351351 0.247514529752 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.148648648649 0.171178102325 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0574324324324 0.112407865282 51% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46861000079 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422297297297 0.546246751206 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.3403465264 49.3433353143 82% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.9090909091 23.0094962315 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4438611424 42.9750493124 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.727272727 135.714022679 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 23.0094962315 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.689975730869 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 49.5442260442 47.7609492067 104% => OK
Elegance: 4.63157894737 2.94281807926 157% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346830681632 0.418131533498 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.245364599504 0.181151798455 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0502084134802 0.0850326197045 59% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.761207259998 0.706616315825 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135295601521 0.157042692854 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21336361662 0.228904883108 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422893229725 0.108899403657 39% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.590632669852 0.367819155151 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.187670762352 0.0812612215331 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248564050717 0.316326947829 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051049280205 0.0921553760075 55% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.02926829268 198% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.