Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today's society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that, many products are sold out by the various kind of advertisement wiles, that would not be genuine or difficulty to accept many. However, in this essay agree with the statement because, that would have detrimental effect on peoples mind and perspective and somehow mislead the society in some extent.
Advertising companies concentrate only to the profitability than the society concern in order to advertising design. In brief, many products marketing gimmick is based up on the ads which they generate into the society. Especially to attract children entrepreneurs used highly nonsense adverts such as to improve memory, intelligence, sports power by the energy drinks or some snacks. Moreover, cosmetic products and beverages makes peoples mind into extraordinary developed fairness and coolness in body respectively. Since, the usage of such products would lead to many other diseases and undesirable effect on viewers mind unknowingly. For instance, fair and lovely cream emphasize, after the several week of usage makes up facial glow profoundly and beer ads depicts the coolness of mind and body.
On the other hand, some advertisement unethical effect on to the society by subliminal. In brief, unlikely, to express the exact view apparently, some hidden hint send to the peoples inner desire like sex and social culture. Many ad designs intentionally compose some secrete inside the advertising models or by products to tend o buy things as by the curiosity. Such subliminal advertisement often make difficulty to receive common people by the inner lining of the products in order to use and feel. For example, cigarette company like viceroys published ad as a dentist suggest the cigarette to the people make illogical for many, such as, a doctor with moral could not do the same at any cost.
To sum up, advertisement are essential for the publicity of product, whereas, misleading trends of ads makes peoples mind confused and failure to follow the good things. Owing to the fact that, negative aspects of advertising methods could not agree as a whole at any reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-04 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | eyraen | 84 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 84
- The pie charts show figures for the use of public libraries in 1990 and 2000 in Britain Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures? 73
- The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 83
- The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun week seems to be countable; consider using: 'several weeks'.
Suggestion: several weeks
...r and lovely cream emphasize, after the several week of usage makes up facial glow profoundl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in brief, kind of, such as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20943952802 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84958805874 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.714378899 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.733333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163006547709 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571758737418 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519229358602 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105357221057 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373279343072 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.