Some old people today struggle with the use of modern technologies such as smartphones and computers.
What is the cause of this?
What are some possible solutions?
Nowadays, in contrast with technophiles, a greater part of elder people faces with challenges while using cutting-edge technologies. Alongside various reasons, the major one might be due to the recent development in advanced gadgets and the potential solution may be mainly found through education.
Old people tend to show a total lack of the required skill set such as typing during the usage of high-tech items and it is the reason why they struggle a lot. Since the older generations did not grow up in an environment surrounded by several electrical appliances, it may be extremely complicated for them to adapt to the new devices from time to time. Among the elderly, it is proven that the learning curve is often too flat and the process is quite tough in comparison with the generation X while mastering enhanced technologies.
Recent generations have been using the revolutionary products for quite a while and typically, children become computer literates even before they start going to school. In general, old people receive help from their grandchildren if they have any and consequently, applying this strategy for the majority of the aged population would be effective in terms of the learning process. Additionally, it was pointed out in the report conducted in the United Kingdom that there were many educational centres built for the people who had troubles catching up with the recent improvements and who were eager to learn about the usage of modern devices. If the method that will be applied involves training high-tech devices, it will be possible for aged people to get used to mobile phones and computers.
Overall, educational sessions and more frequent exposure to gadgets will definitely have an impact on the current situation which is caused by the rapid pace of breakthroughs and technological modifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | hanbnguyenle | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | Elenochka315 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-19 | sayam jutt | 82 | view |
| 2020-08-19 | sohimanjot | 73 | view |
- A common opinion is that art experts are paid considerably low and an appropriate solution might be acquiring salary from the authorities I support this view to some extent and the details about government funding will be given throughout the essay Firstl 84
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony Which approach do you consider to be better in relations 78
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Many people believe that a person s culture is defined by their country of origin while others believe that it has only minor influence Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, so, while, in contrast, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22818791946 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96037065647 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627516778523 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0736368231 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.8 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151572405629 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551864889046 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328897683139 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798683508773 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232852123844 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.