In today’s world of advanced science and technology, many still greatly value artists such as musicians, painters and writers.
What can the arts tell us about life that science cannot?
Nowadays, society is surrounded by enhanced, array of gadgets and cutting-edge technologies, although, the majority of citizens still continue to appreciate artists and authors. This article will be giving details of the reason behind it and explain the massive influence of art that science cannot manage to replace.
Long before the introduction and invention of basic devices, people were specifically passionate about the arts. Since the beginning of the humanity, artworks significantly took place in our lives and people have tried to create as much as it is possible such as cave paintings, murals and, canvases. Additionally, in a study conducted by the United Nations, after investigating various individuals’ brain activity, it was pointed out that people are proven to have a special attachment with melodies, landscapes and, paragraphs from books. The motive for humans’ tendencies towards artistic creations was linked with emotions. The distinctive feature of human beings is advanced cognitive abilities and feelings in comparison with other living creatures. A great number of people believe that pieces of art represent their sensations in an extraordinary way.
Despite the technology being extremely useful and developed more than ever, its influence is nothing close to the effect of art. Likewise, computers and robots are not able to deliver a meaningful message or impress people as art can. However, it is an undeniable fact that current cutting-edge technologies lead to time saving and offer numerous benefits. Even though devices help communities to live in a more efficient way, art causes pleasure and satisfaction in one’s thoughts and views. Furthermore, art’s purpose of creation is to mesmerize individuals while machines are meant to facilitate daily life activities. Consequently, artists are humans as everybody and their works generally comprise of their life-changing experiences and intense emotions which manage to thrill a person unlikely to the impact of gadgets.
In conclusion, harmonized masterpieces such as symphonies, poems, paintings are a result of imaginative ideas and made in order to inspire human beings. Moreover, science emphasizes basic principles of life but as it is commonly said music heals the soul so do the other artworks.
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- A common opinion is that art experts are paid considerably low and an appropriate solution might be acquiring salary from the authorities I support this view to some extent and the details about government funding will be given throughout the essay Firstl 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an extraordinary way" with adverb for "extraordinary"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ieces of art represent their sensations in an extraordinary way. Despite the technology being extr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
... as everybody and their works generally comprise of their life-changing experiences and int...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06807258515 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668571428571 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4029166909 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169080023116 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045660669475 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268445487383 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919612407401 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237029674697 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.