Some people argue that we should do research into their family history. Others, agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Even though the majority of people believe that a study on their family history ought to be made, the rest suggest the opposite. Others strictly stand up for the view that we should concentrate on the current situation and present generations. Arguments from both sides will be mentioned throughout the essay with a personal opinion at the end.
On the one hand, some are quite curious about their family background and want to get a research conducted about previous generations. For instance, nowadays European Jews are striving to collect information about their ancestors from old archives which maybe can enlighten a current study. As various famous authors and philosophers used to say, history repeats itself and therefore, it may be particularly crucial to gain knowledge from earlier centuries in order to create better conditions for the future. Additionally, several scientists from the genealogy area are working to reveal the unknown such as family trees and descendants’ origin.
On the other hand, the others agree with the statement that focusing on the future of the humanity may be more sensible in comparison with tracing back the former generations. It is highly debatable whether we should devote our facilities to the past since we are surrounded by an array of enhanced gadgets and technologies. It can be easily directed that studies cannot be made mutually inclusive at the same time. By several advanced technology companies, it was suggested that dedicating our resources to the upcoming developments is quite essential.
In conclusion, according to my point of view, research projects concentrated on genealogical trees are likely to be necessary due to the fact that descendants may require a sense of belonging. Moreover, even though, historians have been exploring the past constantly, experiments that are based on future technologies should be done no matter what.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tieuquynh | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | annenguyen0203 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...e mentioned throughout the essay with a personal opinion at the end. On the one hand, some a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s family trees and descendants’ origin. On the other hand, the others agree with...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35880398671 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94663971696 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.17255205 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.076923077 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240492958494 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751893914207 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667433873751 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140660566216 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719182817796 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...e mentioned throughout the essay with a personal opinion at the end. On the one hand, some a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s family trees and descendants’ origin. On the other hand, the others agree with...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35880398671 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94663971696 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.17255205 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.076923077 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240492958494 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751893914207 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667433873751 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140660566216 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719182817796 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.