Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or

Essay topics:

Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 254 words.

Although many corporations thought that their employees ought to dress formally and thus look smart, other people consider that the focus should be on good quality of work. In my opinion, deciding whether to focus on well dress up or value quality work should depend on the nature of profession.

On the one hand, people who work in the corporate world need to dress up properly to look smart, according to some. In other words, good looking attire and well dress-up help these corporate workers to fell confident about their work and office culture. For instances, HSBC bank has certain dress codes in place for their male and female workers so that they look pleasant and smart to attract their customers and also to give the organization an identity. Furthermore, it is commonly believed that this requirement is essential in current world in order to succeed in corporate competition.

On the other hand, it is often thought that it is better to concentrate on the quality of work. The reason behind this thought is at the end of the day it is the quality of the work which counts. High quality of work will increase the productivity and overall performance of the workers and also employees will get huge satisfaction. This is why; the corporate culture is changing rapidly. For example, Google employees are not following any dress codes and casual dresses like jeans are also allowed to wear in the office but they give importance to the quality of work. Therefore, this is a win win situation for both the employer and employees.

Finally, in my view, both of these ideas weight significantly for the appropriate situations but the focus should depend on the nature of profession. While people who work in corporate culture need to dress well, there are also sectors where service is more important. To illustrate, physicians wear scrubs, police wear specific uniform. These uniforms are neither attractive nor lucrative, but their service is all which is important for the society. Hence, we need to understand the situation and type of the work before choosing attire.

In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe it would be better to give the preference of dressing or quality of work depending on the nature of the profession.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-29 maria ayoub 78 view
2023-07-27 dolle123 56 view
2023-04-11 johnlark1908 56 view
2023-03-06 eyraen 73 view
2022-02-02 tranvuongphuongmy 61 view
Essays by user AhaanIshaan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
...e quality of work. Therefore, this is a win win situation for both the employer and emp...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 533, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to attire'
Suggestion: to attire
...on and type of the work before choosing attire. In conclusion, despite people havin...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ending on the nature of the profession.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98421052632 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66086858124 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2064118712 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251658114908 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788262220209 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492262279694 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147881961252 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315388715257 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.