Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the discourse surrounding workplace dress codes, opinions diverge significantly on whether employees should adhere to formal attire. While some organizations insist on a smart wardrobe to maintain a professional image, I believe that the quality of work holds greater significance than appearance.
On one hand, certain roles necessitate that staff members present themselves in a professional manner to project authority, dependability, and commitment. The impact of attire on clients’ perceptions cannot be underestimated; for instance, professionals in fields such as education, healthcare, and law are often expected to dress impeccably. Failure to do so may lead to concerns about their qualifications and reliability, potentially harming the company’s reputation and success. Hence, for specific positions, maintaining a smart and professional dress code is indeed important.
Conversely, I argue that relaxed dress codes can substantially enhance productivity and creative output among employees. Casual attire fosters a more relaxed and innovative work atmosphere, allowing employees to focus on their tasks without the distraction of formal clothing dilemmas. For many individuals, formal suits can be cumbersome and uncomfortable, particularly in jobs that demand movement and creativity. Technology firms like Google and Facebook exemplify this approach; their employees, particularly in tech roles such as programming and engineering, are often encouraged to wear casual outfits like T-shirts and jeans while consistently delivering exceptional products and achieving industry leadership.
In conclusion, while I favor the trend towards casual dressing, I acknowledge that it may not be suitable for all professions. Organizations should thus tailor their dress codes to suit each role, taking into account the nature of the work and the expectations associated with different job titles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- Many people believe that motorbikes should be banned Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people choose to have their first child at an older age What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university
- With the advancement in technology the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...drobe to maintain a professional image, I believe that the quality of work holds ...
^
Line 6, column 13, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ode is indeed important. Conversely, I argue that relaxed dress codes can subs...
^
Line 9, column 22, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...y leadership. In conclusion, while I favor the trend towards casual dressing...
^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...avor the trend towards casual dressing, I acknowledge that it may not be suitable...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, hence, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11070110701 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39402765975 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667896678967 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.39150568 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154031314707 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533793272602 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505193512695 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989871883711 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610119009686 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.