Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both theseviews and give your own opinion

In recent times the labor market expands daily and the competition between employees is more antagonistic than ever before. Most people are trying to analyze and predict what employers consider as a prerequisite for their future associates. Are an exceptional resume and top-notch quality of work enough or physical appearance and style matter the most? In any case, the answer to this particular question is not straightforward.

First and foremost, the number one goal of any organization is to remain on top, and to make sure this happens, it is crucial to draft hard-working people who are willing to go the extra mile. Employee's efficiency and high level of performance are the main attributes, that any business should expect, in order to remain ahead of its competition. The type of clothing alone which is chosen by the staff does not guarantee that the clients will receive the best services. Furthermore, in many jobs, such as web development or IT, wearing smart clothes is a redundancy, since employees work remotely from their home and they do not have physical interaction with other employees or clients.

On the other hand, there is strong criticism of the first view due to the fact that many people pay a lot of attention to the style and the vibe that an outfit brings. In other words, clothes are a form of communication between individuals and are closely related to the impression made to others. For example, there are professions such as one of the lawyers, where being dressed in a suit gives an air of professionalism and certainty that are necessary.
In conclusion, I believe that high performance and good quality of work are the main attributes that an organization seeks from its employees. Although looks play a pivotal factor we can not deny that the efficiency and time management of staff members are far more important for a business than the appearance of its employees.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, look, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in any case, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96573208723 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91180119408 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566978193146 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9711225868 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159708266183 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478436115336 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400036312432 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853286075934 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179194516 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.