Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Dressing at the office has always be noted. While some companies believe that wearing formally and smartly is indispensable, others argue that appearance does not decide the quality of work. In my point of view, the outside look is a small factor that has no influence on an organization's value.

To begin with, uniforms are always known as the representation of the organization's characteristics. Wearing formal tells people about where you working and in which field that you are employed. For example, workers in Vietnam have to wear clothes dyed in bright blue in almost every manufactory. In addition, wearing no differences reduces the distance between people and makes them see welcome. For instance, wearing a suit at the office makes employees stay closer.

On the other hand, garment requirements formed employees in a strict rule that was hard to follow. Wearing only a style sometimes makes workers feel no motivation to go to work. Allowing them to wear anything they wish gives them the most satisfaction at work and find no limit in creation. That is the reason why big cooperations like Google, accepting casual clothes at work. Moreover, instead of wasting time in finding uniforms which suitable with company demand, employees can spend time relaxing or working effectively. For instance, people who work at companies that do require formal appearance have better working productivity.

In conclusion, although wearing smartly has a numbered advantages, dressing in the most pleasant way should be encouraged due to the need of caring about employees feelings as well as company's quality.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
Dressing at the office has always be noted. While some companies believe tha...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26356589147 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88396056352 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6678504476 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167609457334 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543616304546 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577505824555 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112235283088 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632147952187 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.