Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work done above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Outward appearance is not only important in personal life but also necessary in working life. Hence, there is an ongoing argument whether an employee should be required to have a good dressing sense. Few organizations are supporting this while others are opposing it and confessing that efficiency of work should be paramount. In my opinion, I believe that this depends on the type of organization and nature of work of each individual.
On one hand, wearing a formal dress and being good looking are the general requirements in some organizations because it is believed that people's first judgement towards another is always on their appearance, therefore their employees appearance will have great impact on the organization output and productivity by promoting sales and boosting income. For instance, the representatives of the sales and marketing department of a bank or any other company are expected to dress coperately and smartly to attract consumers attention thereby enhancing increase output and yielding more profit.
On the other hand, many establishment prefer their employees to be more dedicated, hardworking, have innovative ideas, skills and good customer-employee relationship above smart dressing as this will add more value to the company. For example, a staff of an IT company that deals with sales and repairs of computers and phones is expected to have readily available solutions to every customer presenting complaint on hardware, software and so on. This will in turn bring in more customers to the company thereby boosting their sales, productivity and promoting the image of the company.
In conclusion, l believe that smart dressing and quality efficiency are both vital needs of every organization and every employee and employer should always try to balance them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Mimibae 985 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Mimibae 985 | 78 | view |
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work done above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 78
- Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be all 56
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our homes, leisure and work activities. To what extent does the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages. 84
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer and fewer people are walking these days. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to tackle this problem? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this depends on the type of organization and nature of work of each individual. ...
^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun establishment seems to be countable; consider using: 'many establishments'.
Suggestion: many establishments
...ng more profit. On the other hand, many establishment prefer their employees to be more dedic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oyees to be more dedicated, hardworking, have innovative ideas, skills and good c...
^^
Line 9, column 257, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...to the company. For example, a staff of an IT company that deals with sales and repai...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
... company. For example, a staff of an IT company that deals with sales and repairs of co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42553191489 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03122425878 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570921985816 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.1066793475 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269618864253 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101290472835 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067302013569 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163541125535 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388465937475 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.